 “A number of sherds of Kuro-Araxes manufacture (black or
 grey polished, contrasting
 interior/exterior, grit-tempered) seem much earlier than the EBA II-III wares, but their shapes is
 reminiscent of Late Chalcolithic
 more than EB I types (pl. V : 1-3) : these are low-collared jars with a simple, slightly everted rim. Another type
 also rather alien to the
 Kuro-Araxes repertoire is a large-necked jar with a slightly flaring collar and a horizontal lug (pl. VII : 3)… It is
 possible that such pottery [found at Sağliksuyu] represents some kind of proto-Kuro-Araxian
 ware; a hypothesis which, if
 confirmed, would be very interesting as regards to the puzzle of the origins and development of the Early
 Bronze Transcaucasian
 culture.”
“A number of sherds of Kuro-Araxes manufacture (black or
 grey polished, contrasting
 interior/exterior, grit-tempered) seem much earlier than the EBA II-III wares, but their shapes is
 reminiscent of Late Chalcolithic
 more than EB I types (pl. V : 1-3) : these are low-collared jars with a simple, slightly everted rim. Another type
 also rather alien to the
 Kuro-Araxes repertoire is a large-necked jar with a slightly flaring collar and a horizontal lug (pl. VII : 3)… It is
 possible that such pottery [found at Sağliksuyu] represents some kind of proto-Kuro-Araxian
 ware; a hypothesis which, if
 confirmed, would be very interesting as regards to the puzzle of the origins and development of the Early
 Bronze Transcaucasian
 culture.”
 The
 broadlines chronology are the following :
The
 broadlines chronology are the following : 
–EBA I = ca.
 3400-2900/2800 ; EBA II = ca. 2900/2800-2600
 ; EBA III = ca. 2600-2200.
 •French Archaeologist
 C. Marro and Turkish Archaeologist A. Özfirat, 2003,“Pre-classical Survey in Eastern Turkey. First preliminary Report : the
 Agrı Dag (Mount Ararat) region" , Anatolia Antiqua XI